For some reason, I feel compelled to offer an opinion on the Donald Sterling fracas (the definition for which is “noisy quarrel,” and this has been nothing if not that).
First, it must be said that Sterling is an ass. As a former personal injury and divorce attorney, he has little to recommend him to society in general and, as a sports franchise owner, he built one of the worst NBA franchises to ever come along, with his team at the bottom of the League for nearly 30 years.
Second, the man has committed countless acts of adultery, publicly flaunting his infidelity for all to see. He appears to possess no ethical standards whatever, but then, that may be redundant after saying he was an attorney. To me, he is a reprehensible human being who deserves no respect and little compassion. Put simply, Donald Sterling is a poor excuse for a human being.
Yet… I find myself obliged to defend him in this case, despite knowing that some will object strongly.
Reading the transcript of Sterling’s comments, rather than simply listening to the recording, is illuminating to me:
“Did you have to post them on Facebook, where my friends can see and comment about it to me? I don’t care what you do with them. Talk to them, be friends with them, go ahead and sleep with them if you want to. Just don’t post them to FB where my friends can see.”
To me, it appears as if he’s complaining more about how she is embarrassing him because of the way his friends, no doubt other “pink-faced privileged white men,” respond to her behavior, rather than that he actually dislikes the people she hangs with. I can just imagine how a bunch of old, rich, white guys might tease him about the way his latest strumpet flaunts her relationships with younger men. “Hey Don, can’t you control that floozy you’ve been telling us is your girlfriend?” or, “Hey old man, don’t you have a leash for your little bitch?” Even for a disgusting reprobate like Sterling, that could be embarrassing.
Here are the main points to make in Sterling’s defense:
- This was a private conversation and Sterling had every right to expect that it would remain private.
- The recording was illegally made. The law in California is very clear on this, that both parties must give consent to be recorded. This recording could never be used in a court of law.
- The fact that he mentions the skin color of her associates indicates the prejudices of the friends who tease him about her behavior, far more than it does his own.
- The woman who leaked the recording is as reprehensible and disgusting as Sterling. At best, she is a gold-digger, if not an outright prostitute, who used her intimate knowledge of the man against him for her own unethical purposes.
Finally, the freedom to express oneself, especially in private, as well as the right to property, should be sacrosanct. The very idea that Sterling has been removed as an active participant in the team he owns, and the possibility that he could lose his ownership of the team, makes me cringe. This is a very slippery slope upon which the NBA has embarked, and the owners of the other franchises should be careful about how they choose to act against him.
OK, go ahead and hammer me. I’m ready…